Mandela the Fool.
There's quite a lot of commentary about
the hypocrisy of some conservative and right wing politicians who are
singing the praises of Nelson Mandela now he's dead. Many of them
have previously accused him of being a left wing apologist and even a
terrorist. According to a lawyer colleague of mine, there are also
many South African ex-pat lawyers living in Australia who have
claimed for many years to be Mandela supporters, even though they
aren't prepared to stay in the country he has ruled and supposedly
transformed for the better.
The contradictory nature of their
seemingly sudden about face isn't all that surprising. The idea that
a politician or political commentator should follow some kind of pure
linear philosophical trajectory is naïve to say the least. They've
been chopping and changing, back-flipping and re-evaluating their
positions for years. Political affiliations are complicated things.
Just ask Malcolm Fraser, or, were it possible, the late Christopher
Hitchens, who both travelled in opposite directions right across the
left/right political divide, and no one seemed all that surprised by
it.
And no doubt Mandela himself changed
positions and opinions on any number of political subjects. It's
almost impossible to be a president of a country, or of any political
organisation, without either compromising or contradicting oneself.
The universal attraction of Mandela is
precisely that: he's attractive. And by this I mean you just can't
not like the guy. And I suggest that it was his sense of humour that
was a vital part of that attraction. Yes he was humble, saintly,
tolerant and forgiving, but the fact that he laughed and joked in the
face of so much political tumult, and in the company of so many
exalted and self-important leaders, meant that he had the untouchable
status of the fool.
And yes, he was left wing. He gave
explicit support to Castro, opposed Israeli occupation of areas taken
from Palestine, and opposed the invasion of Iraq. The ANC began as a
pro-communist organisation. There's no question that socialism was
embedded in his general philosophical outlook.
He reminds me of the Italian Marxist
comedian and playwright Dario Fo. For years Fo has performed with his
wife Franka Rame to packed playhouses and theatres throughout Italy.
In 1997 he was awarded the Nobel prize for literature. I saw him
perform in Parma in 1998 to at least two thousand people. There is no
possibility that a majority, or even a significant minority, of that
audience were of the political left. While those northern Italian
towns were pro-communist sixty years ago, the general population of
Parma would nowadays be middle class and anticommunist. But the
public come out to see this radical leftist raconteur, laugh at his
jokes and give him standing ovations. As a performer Fo has an almost
Papal significance.
Why? Because he makes them laugh. But
also because he does so without hubris; he maintains the status of
the fool – the comedian, the clown. One vital role of a comedian is
to be honest. And Mandela was honest; he held his positions on
Palestine, Iraq and Cuba without compromise. Like the Dalai Lama and
Fo he refused to give up his support for the underdog, the
disenfranchised, and he did it with charm and humour.